Showing posts with label blog. Show all posts
Showing posts with label blog. Show all posts

New Vehicle! VW Transporter T6.1 Campervan

A couple of years ago my wife and I hired a VW Transporter-based campervan and, together with our two kids, spent a week touring Wales in it. Much to my surprise, I loved it (as did everyone else). It's taken a while but we've just taken delivery of this Transporter T6.1, which we were able to choose some of the options for ourselves. It's a Highline model so the base was pretty well specced for a van (including heated windscreen, heated seats, heated mirrors, adaptive cruise control, front fog lights, front and rear parking sensors). 

As part of the campervan conversion it now has a pop top roof (so can sleep four and gives loads of headroom when not being used as a bed), RIB bed, solar panel, two gas hobs, sink (with 57-litre underslung water tank), microwave, fridge, diesel heater, spinning front "captains" seats, two tables, bamboo kitchen surfaces, oak effect flooring, numerous USB and power sockets, wireless charger, shower point, awning (with exterior light), front body kit, side bars, and 20" inch alloys. It's powered by the 2.0-litre diesel engine, sending 150bhp through a DSG gearbox.

We've just returned from our second weekend away in it and it's fair to say that it's everything we hoped it would be. These vans aren't for everyone but the ability to pack up and leave in just a few minutes before heading to a new location makes going away more fun than simply staying in a single location in a hotel room. I should also say that I think most people would be stunned how usable the space inside actually is (I certainly was). Two adults and two children really isn't an issue (just make sure you stay somewhere with showers and toilets!).

Upgrades await. I've already added a dashcam and switched out the side indicators for smoked sequential units (see first and last pictures) but the first major one is a big audio upgrade in a few weeks. As someone who loves quality sound, the stock setup is dismal! 

Finally, shout out to Cambridge Campervans who supplied and converted the van. They were very helpful throughout the process and I have no hesitation in recommending them if you're looking for something similar.






Share:

Goodbye MX-5

With the arrival of my Civic Type-R it's time to say goodbye to my trusty Mazda MX-5 30th Anniversary Edition. I've owned it from new and, in that three and a half years, it's been a brilliant little car. When I sold my BMW M4 I wanted something very different, and it was certainly that. Once you drive one it's difficult not to like them; small, light, excellent weight distribution, rear wheel drive and loads of driving feedback. What's not to love? 

The orange paint scheme might not be to everyone's liking but, with only 3,000 worldwide (of which 550 came to the UK), it was never going to be a common sight. The excellent upgraded Brembo brakes, Recaro seats, engraved forged alloys and alcantara interior meant that it was more than just a colour change for the limited edition car. So, as one driving chapter closes, I move onto a new one and raise a glass to the plucky little underdog from Japan that more than paid for itself with the smiles it provided.










Share:

The Driver (1978)

The '70s saw some great car chases captured for film, utilising some very cool vehicles. A non-exhaustive list of films for petrolheads to check out would include Vanishing Point (1971), Gone in 60 Seconds (1974), The Getaway (1972), Smokey and the Bandit (1977), The French Connection (1971) and, if you want to go back a couple of more years, 1968's Bullitt. One film which has evaded me though, up until now, is The Driver from 1978.

I rectified that last night and was treated to a taut crime thriller which simply made me kick myself for not hunting it down sooner. Directed by Walter Hill (who also made The Warriors, Southern Comfort, 48 Hrs. and produced the Alien films, amongst others) there is no fat in this film. It's dialogue light and action heavy and, coming in at 91 minutes, it's a far cry from some of the cumbersome three hour marathons which are churned out today. The car chases are excellent and easily stand up to anything produced today. They are, to coin a phrase, worth the price of the entry ticket alone.

If, like me, you're an avid film fan you'll be pleased to note that it's just been remastered in 4K. It was poorly received at the time but has gone on to gain something of a cult status, being praised by the likes of Tarantino and Edgar Wright (who was heavily influenced by it when making Baby Driver). 

No film of this type would be complete without some notable vehicles so I've grabbed a few stills from the Internet Movies Cars Database and stitched them together. On display is a 1976 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am, a 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 S, a 1977 Pontiac Firebird, a 1965 Ford Mustang, a 1973 Chevrolet C-10 and a 1974 For Galaxie 500.



Share:

Analysing My Motorcycle Crash

A number of years ago, I was on a motorcycle track day at Rockingham circuit in Northamptonshire. By this point I'd done around twenty days on track so I certainly wasn't a novice... although I certainly rode like one in the lead up to the accident I'm about to show you.

What you'll see in the video below is me messing up the entry to the corner, miss the apex and then apply too much throttle on the exit... with disastrous results.

I'm grateful, at least, that I had a camera on the bike because the resulting blow I took to the head led to amnesia and me losing the couple of days leading up to accident. Even now, years later, I cannot remember a thing about it. My first memories of the incident are leaving hospital.
Share:

Old Car Adverts: The Good, The Bad And The Downright Sexist

Time and attitudes move on, outlooks change and what is deemed acceptable behaviour evolves. I spent some time trawling the web, with an interest in old car adverts and how different they look now, compared to when they were originally released. The most striking thing is how overtly sexist many of them are; pandering to the outdated notion that women cannot drive or, at least, aren't interesting in it. There are some examples below of awful adverts which would be ridiculed if they were they released today, and rightly so.

In amongst those are a good selection of cheesy adverts and a few which have genuinely stood the test of time. My favourite comment belongs to the 1970s Vauxhall Chevette advert which proclaims that "the gutsy 1256cc engine thrusts you from to 0-60 in 15.3 seconds". So, here you go: a step back in time to when you grab a brand new car for less than £1,000 and denigrate your wife while doing so.
Share:

Lottery Win Fantasy Car Garage

In the current circumstances, I've had more time than usual sitting around at home. This has led me to wonder how I’d go about spending the record-breaking lottery win which is never going to materialise. The result is this: my ‘money is no limit’ lottery win car garage, with just a couple of stipulations:

1. They must all be chosen to be used, to fulfil different needs. Strictly no investment opportunity garage Queens (and no-one in their right mind would choose ten supercars).

2. Only one car per manufacturer.
Share:

Track Day Advice Guide

Way back in 2005 I wrote a track day guide on a motorcycle forum. Here I’ve updated that guide and made it car friendly too. So, if you’re wondering what to expect on your first foray out onto a circuit (apart from the obligatory nerves), then look no further.

This relates to non-competitive UK track days although some of the advice will undoubtedly be the same, whichever country you’re in. To give you an idea of my experience level, I’ve done around 25 motorcycle track days and 4 car ones.

You can check out the video and gallery from my most recent car track day here.

What do I need on the day?
Obvious ones first: a vehicle and a licence!

You can hire bikes and cars for use on track but they won’t come cheap at all. The vast majority of people use their own machines and you must ensure that it’s roadworthy. If you’ve got pieces of plastic hanging off it, then don’t be surprised if you’re not allowed on track.

It’s a good idea to take a tool kit, so that you have things available to make impromptu repairs with.

You’ll likely need a helmet, even if it’s a car day (and definitely for a bike day!). Make sure that it bears the British Standards kitemark, to be safe. These can often be rented from the organisers at car events. For a motorcycle day, you’ll also need gloves, boots, and one or two-piece (zipped) leathers.

What can I expect on the day?
It’ll likely be an early start, with registration commencing around 7:30am. If you have a long way to travel you may wish to consider a hotel the night before. Leaving home at 5am, spending all day on track and then travelling home afterwards is likely to be quite tiring.

Signing in will involve registering your attendance, having your licence checked, signing disclaimer and liability forms, and collecting a wristband. The latter will be checked each time before you’re allowed onto the circuit.

There will be a briefing about an hour later, where a member of the organisation team will talk about the circuit’s layout, etiquette, weather conditions, timetable for the day etc. They will also run through the different flags and what they mean. It is compulsory to attend this, even if your name is Valentino Rossi or Lewis Hamilton.

Some days will have ‘open pit lanes’, meaning you can come and go as you please onto the circuit. Remember to limit your track time to sensible levels; giving you and your vehicle time to recover. The abuse that a vehicle takes on circuit is far, far in excess of that which it’ll take in normal day-to-day driving (especially on components like tyres and brakes).

Other days will have everyone assigned to a group, and you often choose that group when booking. Novice, Intermediate and Fast are three fairly normal designations and should speak for themselves. It’s designed to keep people of similar skill levels together; no-one wants to be spooked by a club racer on their first track day. If you’re reading this for notes, then you should probably book yourself into Novice but don’t worry, if you turn out to be a track god you’ll get moved into a more appropriate group. Alternatively, if you think that lapping the local roundabout makes you Marc Marquez but, in reality, you hold up five bikes into every corner in the fast group, you’ll get moved too.

The groups are announced normally over a PA system and will go out for 15-20 minute sessions. This means that you'll get 30-40 minutes break in between your sessions out on track. There will be an hours break for lunch and then the previous timing arrangement will continue until about 5pm (or failing light, depending on time of year). Expect to get somewhere in the region of five sessions during a day. It may not sound a lot, but you will be tired when you leave. On one day at Donington Park I managed 160 miles on track, although that was unusual.

Normally there will be instructors on hand for free advice. If you're quick enough (I mean running, not on the track) you can grab one for some free tuition. They’ll watch your lines, braking etc. and give you advice and how and where to improve.

There may be a tyre supplier/fitter on site and sometimes a suspension service offering customised adjustments for you. These are certainly common on bike days.

Finally, aside from the medics and marshals, there will be a photographer so that when you get a cool action shot you can post it on Facebook and amaze all your relatives.

My biggest advice on the day? Relax and enjoy yourself. You won't break any lap records and you won't be the fastest person there, so don't try. You'll either end up frustrated or in A&E. If someone passes you, let them go, they're faster. If you give chase you run the severe risk of outstretching your ability and crashing.

Will there be refreshments?
Undoubtedly. This will vary in scale from a burger van to a fully stocked canteen with hot meals, but there will be something. Don't eat so much that you're lethargic and bloated (especially at lunch) but do keep yourself hydrated.

Will there be fuel available onsite?
This will vary. Some tracks have onsite petrol stations (which are not always open) and some don't. Someone will be able to direct you to the nearest petrol station should you need some during the day and there isn't any onsite. Bear in mind it can be a pain in the backside to re-attach mirrors, number plates etc. If you can, fill up as close to the track as possible in the morning. The other option is to fill a jerry can and take that with you (if you’re in a car, of course).

Do I need to "track prep" my vehicle?
You don't need to do anything. However, on a bike I would advise that firstly you remove or tape up your mirrors; you don't need them. There is absolutely no need for you to be looking behind you. If someone wants to overtake it is their responsibility to do so safely and without impeding or unsettling you - this is not racing. Looking behind you will only draw your attention from what is in front of you, which cannot be a good thing. Removing the mirrors (rather than taping them) means one less thing to replace should you stack it!

Some people remove or tape up their number plates. Why? Well, maybe they want to be in a position to claim from insurance should they crash and don't need evidence popping up at a later date showing that they actually crashed on a track day and therefore making the claim fraudulent. There are also rumours that people from insurance companies visit track days for this very reason and make notes on vehicles. It could be that you could have an entirely legitimate claim turned down if the company saw you on a track day a couple of days before your real accident. It's unlikely, but why risk it? There are plenty of insurance companies who will insure you for the day so, if you’re concerned, don’t risk it.

Check tyre pressures and you may wish to drop them. Normally there will be a tyre van at the track and you can generally ask them (or an instructor) for some free advice. The tyres will be working a lot harder and getting a lot warmer than they ever do on the road. As they get warm the pressure will increase, and you don't want over inflated tyres. Someone will have a pressure gauge if you don't. Don't be afraid to ask around; people are normally very helpful at these days.

It goes without saying that you should have checked your oil levels, tyre wear etc. before the day.

If you have a non-standard exhaust on your vehicle you should check noise regulations for the day. Some circuits are governed by council restrictions and will test your vehicle accordingly. If it's too loud, you won't be allowed out. Some tracks (such as Brands Hatch) are allowed a set number of "noisy" days each year, so look out for them if you're concerned.

What happens if it rains?
On a bike, you'll get wet. It takes a lot for the entire day to be cancelled (I've only known it when there was snow and ice on the track) so the chances are you'll be allowed on track at some point. Whether you go out is up to you, many people don't on bikes. If it gets really bad during the day they might stop letting people out until it clears (this will vary greatly between organisers and tracks). If the day goes ahead that's the end of it; no refund, no rebooking.

Will I get laughed at for being slow?
Chances are, there will always be someone slower than you. I have seen people at track days on bikes never designed to go anywhere near a circuit and riding with three inch chicken strips. I’ve seen people in family SUVs wobbling from side to side, all over the track, through corners. Are they slow? Yes. Do they hold people up? Of course not. It's a race track. There is so much room in most places you won't believe. Donington Park, for example, is 10 metres wide; if someone can't get past you it's not your problem.

Flags
It’s not essential that you know these as they should go through them on the day (although not all people go through all the flags, so it can't hurt to know them beforehand).

Green: Everything is okay, carry on.


Yellow: There has been an incident; slow down, observe and no overtaking. Maybe someone has fallen off around the next corner and is lying in the middle of the track. Do not assume that if you pass one crash that it is all clear - there could be another. Wait for a green flag before proceeding as normal.


Red: The session has been stopped prematurely. This means that an incident has occurred that is serious enough for the circuit control to end the session. Slow right down and head straight back into the pits. Strictly no overtaking. The longer that bikes are out on track, the longer it could be taking to get an ambulance out to someone in need of attention.


Blue: There is someone faster behind you. Safely let them by.


Yellow/Red Stripes: Slippery surface or potential reduction in available grip. Only normally used in certain areas where the hazard occurs. Maybe somebody crashed and left a trail of oil, or maybe it's rained at one part of the track. Check the track for the hazard when you see the flag and continue cautiously.


Black: This will be waved at one specific person. That person must come into the pits. It could be that their dangerous and the circuit control want a word about their behaviour. It could be that there's something wrong with their vehicles (e.g. leaking oil, something hanging off). If you think it might be you they're pointing to, come in, they'll soon send you back out if not. Repeated black flags for dangerous driving/riding will get you kicked off for good.


Chequered: End of the session, waved at the finish line. Finish that lap and then come back into the pits.


Like what you see here? Please check out my other pages:

Share:

My Car Obsessed 4-Year Old Drives Pretty Well (in Games)

My little boy is 4 years old and, for the most part, I've done him the disservice of assuming he's still pretty much useless at everything. I should stress that this is an viewpoint born from the experience of watching him try to put his shoes on correctly or walk through a doorway without cracking his head into a solid object. Anyway, we've shared an interest from day one, and that's cars. He seemingly has thousands of the toys, scattered everywhere in the house (and I'm as much to blame for that, I'll admit; "Hey, Jeanette, hold on a minute. I must get Ethan this 1970 Porsche 917 for his collection!" and so on). 

Anyway, a few months back he took an interest in the driving games which I play on the PC and XBox and, after shooing him away with the assumption he'd less use behind the wheel than a drunk, blind geriatric, I've taken to involving him in my games... and he's shocked me. The little bugger's getting pretty competent with a controller; he loves a donut and has pulled off some pretty decent drifts in his time. He can also drive more than fifty metres without looking like a car/hedge/tree interaction is imminent, so that places him above his mum in the skills stakes.

The downside is, while working from home in the current environment, he asks if I've "finished work yet?" every five minutes, so that we can play. It gets tedious, quickly, but I still wouldn't change it for the world. I catch Jeanette chuckling as she passes by while Ethan's berating me for not taking the road he wanted to explore, shouting "INCOMING!" as he launches his '70s muscle car* off a cliff into an abyss with maniacal glee or bellowing "TREE FIGHT!" when he enters a wooded area at full speed.

(*Yes, he seems to love old American muscle cars. I have 300+ cars available in Forza Horizon 4 and, without prompting, he gravitates towards those old school, noisy barges. Good lad. His mother, also a fan, is proud. The downside is that he now wants me to buy one. In real life. Preferably one which has "the engine sticking out of the bonnet". His head will explode when he watches The Fast and the Furious).

PS. Having said the above, I was less than impressed with Ethan's suggestion that "we should smash your car up like that" followed by "it's okay, you can just get a new one".

PPS. Yes, that's my kids playing a PC game (BeamNG.Drive, if you're interested) while watching sodding a YouTube video about car games on the TV in my home office. This could be a slippery slope.

PPS. Don't judge me about their hair. It always looks like that, even after combing/brushing. I have a pair of scarecrows for kids.

Ethan carnage level: Standard


Like what you see here? Please check out my other pages:

Share:

Cannonball Record Beaten By Solo Driver




We've all seen the Cannonball Run films, a must for any petrol head, featuring a coast-to-coast US time trial; racing from New York to Los Angeles. Well, it's not as fictional as you might think. The real life start point is the Red Ball Garage in Manhattan, New York and the finish point is the Portofino Hotel, Los Angeles. The distance is a touch over 2,800 miles. This unsanctioned, illegal race has been taking place for decades and, unsuprisingly, is what inspired the 1981 film, starring Burt Reynolds.

Due to the nature of the event, records have tended to stand for some time, such is the required preperation and willingness to break the law (with the potential of a custodial sentence, if apprehended).

In 2006 Alex Roy and Dave Maher set a new record of 31 hours and 4 minutes, in a 2000 BMW M5 at an average speed of 91mph. They were the subject of the recently released documentary, APEX: The Secret Race Across America.

That record stood until 2013 when it was bested by Ed Bolian, Dave Black and Dan Huang in a 2004 Mercedes AMG CL55 in 28 hours and 50 seconds, at an average speed of 98mph.

It wasn't until 2019 that the record was beaten again. This time it was Arne Toman, Doug Tabbutt, and Berkeley Chadwick in a Mercedes AMG E63 in 27 hours and 25 seconds, at an average of 103mph.

Then came COVID-19, lock down, and quieter roads. In early 2020 "Captain Chaos" (a team not going public) did the run in 26 hours and 38 minutes, in an Audi A8 at an average of 106mph.

And then we come to Fred Ashmore. Insanely, not only did he complete the 2,806 mile trip in 25 hours and 55 minutes, but he also did it solo... in a rented Mustang! It's unclear how Avis will react when they discover that he removed all the superfluous seats and replaced them with additional fuel tanks, but I doubt they'll be pleased. They'll be even less pleased when they realise that he drove the car at an average speed of 108mph for the whole journey. His time knocked a good chunk off the previous record, a feat made even more impressive when you consider that he got stuck at a checkpoint for 25 minutes.

As is normal, Fred added extra fuel tanks to his car. What was usual though is that he figured that by not taking along passengers/co-drivers, he could utilise the saved space for more tanks. Whereas previous runs had cars equipped with around 250 litres of fuels tanks, Fred managed to squeeze an incredible 490 litres into the Mustang! More fuel meant less fuel stops and less time standing still. Amazingly, he managed the whole journey with just one stop, where he was met by a team who refilled all the tanks. He finished the event with just 39 miles worth of fuel remaining; impressive in a car which recorded an average of 12.3mpg for the journey!

Toilet breaks were avoided by urinating into empty bottles as, despite the length of the event, every second counts. Record or not, this was a supreme endurance achievement. Staying awake (and alert) at speeds often in excess of 150mph for 26 hours is no small ask.

Jeremy Clarkson once said that the fastest car is a rental and it turns out he might be right.

I posted about this achievement on Facebook and was happy to have the man himself chime in:


His Avis feedback form on the Mustang is superb.


Although, I'm not sure if they'll view this as good publicity or trolling.


But he said he did well in the same car later on, so maybe it's an advert for how well Avis maintain their cars?


He did say that he didn't mind me posting his comments here and that he put the seats back and replaced the rear tyres!


The Facebook thread is here.

If you want to hear from the man himself, here's my interview with him:


Like what you see here? Please check out my other pages:
Share:

Norton Motorcycles Goes Into Administration

Today its been reported that Norton Motorcycles has gone into administration, placing around 100 jobs at risk at the British manufacturer which was founded in 1898. The company has been struggling to pay its tax bill and now it looks to have succumbed to debt of around £300,000. The Telegraph reports that, in its last accounts, the company registered sales of £6.7m with pre-tax profits of just £33,701.

Here are a selection of photos I've taken at shows over the last year or so.
Share:

The Cars of '6 Underground'

It's been out a while now, so there's a reasonable chance that you may have watched Michael Bay's latest explosion-fest, 6 Underground, on Netflix. I watched it over the weekend and, although I'd heard about the crazy car chase at the beginning it didn't quite prepare me for the 20 minute bat-shit crazy concoction of testosterone and twisted metal which followed. I say this in a good way.

Share:

Ford Mustang Mach-E First Impressions

Yesterday I was given a tour of the new all-electric Ford Mustang Mach-E, which was announced last month. It's one of only a few pre-production models doing the rounds and, as such, it was requested that I took no video or photos. Fair enough. The last thing Ford want is people online highlighting slight imperfections or talking about design elements which might not find their way into the finished product. Although you can place an order on the Ford website now, don't expect to take delivery of the car until late next year.

Available as rear wheel or all wheel drive, prices will start at around £40,000 and climb to £58,000. Range is quoted as an impressive (up to) 370 miles. How that plays out in the real world remains to be seen. Performance is stated at an initially disappointing "less than 7 seconds" for the 0-60mph sprint, although we were assured that this is an extremely conservative figure and the final time should be much lower. I suspect it'll need to be if it's to compete with the likes of the Tesla Model 3 (which sits in the same price bracket) and, above all, prove itself worthy of the Mustang moniker.

The name is an odd one for me. It was suggested that 'Mustang' found its way onto this vehicle because of its performance credentials, but it seems weird seeing the iconic muscle car name attached to an electric SUV. That aside, the car itself looks good in the flesh - certainly better than in the pictures, I think. The removal of the front grill (not required as there's no engine to keep cool) looks a bit strange and I have the feeling it'll lead to some healthy sales of paint touch-up sticks from irritating, and unavoidable, stone chips. The familiar galloping horse sits on the front of the car and, behind that, the creased bonnet is one attractive element which fails to stand out in the released photos.

At the rear of the car you can see the styling cues taken from its coupe stable-mate, in the form of the very distinctive lights (and another galloping horse badge). The way the two tone roof sweeps down helps to lend the impression that this is a sleek sports car rather than a boxy SUV and it works well. As you'd expect, there appeared to be plenty of storage space. A decent sized boot is accompanied by a "front trunk", in the space where the engine would be in a traditional car. In a car like this, the batteries are kept low in the chassis to keep the centre of gravity down and weight distribution as ideal as possible.

When I drove a V8 Mustang I was fairly critical of the interior. Elements of it felt a bit cheap and that's probably because they are. You can't expect to pay Mustang money for a honking great V8 muscle car and get top-end German build materials included in the mix. If anything, Ford should be congratulated for ensuring the budget is spent on the bits which matter most: those which directly affect driving enjoyment. Anyway, the interior on this model looks a step up. The materials and equipment look impressive, and the obligatory huge (15.5 inch) screen doesn't look as obtrusive as it does in many electric cars. I'd certainly like to hear the huge B&O soundbar which appears to run across the entirety of the dashboard...

In summary, I went to see this new Mustang with mixed feelings. I'm not an SUV fan and, although it might be the future, I'm not fully sold on electric cars yet. However, what I saw looked impressive. Ford have produced an attractive and practical car, which should provide good range and performance, at a competitive price. You can argue whether it deserves to wear the Mustang badge, but I'll certainly be interested in taking one for a spin once they're available.

Finally, special thanks goes to Chris at Hartwell Kidlington Ford for arranging this preview.


Like what you see here? Please check out my other pages:

Share:

Movie and TV Cars (Part 2)

Continuing from part one, here's my continued look at some of the coolest and most iconic cars found on film. Come with me as I look at more of the cinematic vehicles which have captured the hearts of people over the years.

Ghostbusters

You’d hardly call the 1959 Cadillac/hearse combination, generally referred to as Ecto-1, a classic car. Indeed, the vehicle itself broke down on Brooklyn Bridge during the filming of the sequel, landing the filmmakers with a fine from the NYPD. It is, however, up there with the most recognisable vehicles in cinema history and it being a bit odd, a bit old and broken, and looking like it’ll fall to pieces at any second is what helps make it cool. It’s an underdog and everyone loves an underdog.


Share:

Movie and TV Cars (Part 1)

As well as loving cars and motorcycles, I’m also a massive film fan. This means that occasionally I get the opportunity to watch as my favourite screen-bound hero slips behind the wheel of fantasy exotica. Sometimes it’s completely unexpected and catches you off-guard, like when John Travolta pulls out the keys to a TVR Tuscan in 'Swordfish'. This is a car which is likely to be obscure to the average cinema goer, but instantly evokes feelings of passion and raw speed in me. Such moments can be ruined though. In this case it was in the subsequent pursuit where several unremarkable SUVs manage to keep pace with the lightweight British powerhouse.

It’s a risky business, mixing passions across different fields. Many films attempt it, with varying degrees of success. Some have catapulted vehicles to legendary status, whereas others have fallen completely flat. Let’s take a look at a few of the film and TV vehicles which have stood the test of time.
Share:

The Pain of Commuting by Train

Time for a rant, because I like ranting (and I generally have my tongue firmly in my cheek so please excuse my perceived misanthropy).

I’ve been commuting into London on a daily basis for the last three years. No matter the method used, it's a painful journey and takes a couple of hours each way. For a while I took the train, until I succumbed to a car/bus combination. Below are the many reasons why...

While the drive to the train station and subsequent train journey (which is followed by a stint on an underground train) can be tiring, it is not the worst aspect of the trip.  I’ve written about my disdain for public transport before but that was before I’d discovered a whole host of new irritations which I’m delighted to regale you with.

So, what hacks me off? Oh, where do I begin? In no particular order:

Anyone who walks up to a busy barrier and then starts looking for their ticket should have theirs torn up and be forced to buy a new one.

People lacking any kind of spatial awareness should be punished for this by being pushed off a platform. It seems quite fitting. If I am walking alongside someone, in the same direction, and they suddenly veer across my path then my shoving them in front of a speeding locomotive should be viewed as self-defence. It’s logical.

Umbrellas are designed to keep you dry in the rain, not to be used as some kind of medieval battlefield weapon to clear a space around you with the clear intention of blinding people.

Lack of personal space. Please don’t lean against me, continually brush against me, or rest your arm against mine when sitting next to me. Definitely don’t sit so that your leg is touching mine. I shuffled into the corner of a seat on the train recently, leaning towards the window. The guy next to me took it as an invitation to spread out further. No!

If you need wheels on your laptop bag then you should exercise more, carry less crap or get a laptop which wasn’t made in 1991. These people drag their bags a few feet behind them, completely oblivious to the carnage they cause when they zig-zag across a busy platform, leaving a trail of commuters sent sprawling in their wake. I’ve considered kicking the things over (when they dart across my path) but I figure that a 1991 Dell laptop which is heavy enough to require wheels is probably more than a match for the bones in my foot.

I understand better than most why someone would deploy their bag on the empty seat next to them. They don’t want to sit next to anyone, I get it; me neither. However, when the train is rammed to capacity don’t look at me like I just shot your dog and burned your house down when I ask you to move it. Alternatively, show me that you bought two tickets for your journey.

Bicycles can be great and I understand why people take them on the train. I have no issue with that. This one’s less of an annoyance and more one of complete bewilderment. Can someone tell me why these cyclists, who are commuting to a desk job, are geared up like they’re about to embark on a particularly gruelling stage of the Tour de France? They’re cycling to work – they don’t need to be fully geared up in so much Lycra that they look like a walking advert for a fetish convention. (Maybe that’s where they’re going?) Do the improved aerodynamics allow them to arrive at their desk three seconds earlier? Pointless. Also, they certainly don’t need all the additional bum bags and enough kit to survive a trekking expedition across the Himalayas.

During winter it’s especially amusing to watch the light shows. It’s like a cycling commuter competition: “I notice you only have one rear light on the back of your five-gear Halford’s special, you amateur. I have more flashing lights attached to me and my bike than the space craft from Close Encounters of the Third Kind”.

If you don’t remember Dynamo from The Running Man, watch it again. The casting director picked him up travelling the London Paddington to Oxford train route with his fold-up Brompton.

On the subject of bemusing sights, I'd like to ask the women wearing smart business attire/suits why they wear completely mismatched trainers on their commute. Surely picking some shoes to wear which don't cripple your feet would alleviate the need to change. As for the men doing it, pack it in. You look stupid.

I’ve nothing against a train’s designated quiet carriage; in fact I love the idea. To be fair, 90% of the people who normally populate them are fine too (if they’re not sitting next to me). However, there are always (and I mean always) one or two people who are either blind, ignorant, oblivious or a combination of all three. Maybe the “Quiet Carriage” signs need to be written three times their current size in flashing neon letters. How can someone not think it’s odd when they sit chatting to their friend while the other forty people in the carriage glare at them in stony silence, their morning snoozes interrupted? Yes, challenge them, enquire whether they’re illiterate etc. but I tell you now, be prepared for the wave of indignation which you’ll receive in return.

Noise was always going to be an issue for me (and I’ve written about my misophonia elsewhere). It’s not as bad as you might think, but there are some irritations. People who eat noisily should be ejected from the train (at full speed… into a tree). People who whistle the letter ‘s’ when they talk should have their face cocooned in gaffer tape and anyone with a newspaper should be forced to translate it into Mandarin once they’ve finished reading it. The latter one is really bugs me. I’m fairly certain that I often commute with a bunch of finalists from the Newspaper Rustling World Championships. It should not take twenty seconds to turn a bloody page and it definitely shouldn’t occur at five second intervals. If you’re flicking through it so vigorously because you can’t read the big words, I suggest something with more pictures or, preferably, a different train. The same is true with food containers: only someone with an IQ lower than a deckchair and the dexterity of a hippo needs an eternity of rustling in order to fish out a single crisp from the bag.

Snoring should (and does) bother me immensely but I try to rein in my rage because I’m positive that I’ve done it on a train at some point. Exactly the same is true when the person sitting next to me shares the upper frequencies of whatever music’s playing through their headphones. After all, I might complain about a lot, but I try not to be a hypocrite while I’m doing it…

Of course, the obvious answer to all of this is that I should drive. Unfortunately that process is more time consuming and, marginally, more expensive. Moreover, I’d still have to deal with moronic members of the public, albeit in a slightly more detached environment (and I have already ranted about people’s driving standards). Clearly I need find a way to work from home, where the commute is roughly twenty seconds and the only traffic is likely to be my daughter frantically searching for teddy or my wife verbalising her confusion as to why she’s always late (for the four hundredth time). That way the only numpty I’d have to encounter is my kamikaze 3-year old son and I’m beginning to think that even he is less selfish than the average commuter.

Share:

Pages